Careless People, Critical Choices
Insights from Sarah Wynn-Williams’ Careless People about the dark side of Facebook's quest for global domination.
📬 Welcome to Read to Build
Your go-to newsletter for curated insights from the best business books—distilled for product builders, tech founders, and team leaders.
There’s no better day to launch than today—Happy World Book Day! 🎉 Please Check out Why Read to Build? 📚
First up: Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams
Imagine the inner workings of a tech giant, exposed: the thrills, the screw-ups, and the disillusionment when ambition meets real-world consequences. In her riveting memoir Careless People , Wynn-Williams—former Meta exec and advocate-turned-whistleblower—takes you behind the velvet ropes of Facebook’s global policy machine. From bizarre state-dinner misadventures with Mark Zuckerberg to the stark failures on hate speech in Myanmar, this book reveals how power, speed, and “move fast” thinking can collide with human values.
🚀 Why it matters to you:
Insider DNA: Learn how real decisions get made when profit, politics, and public good collide.
Hard-earned wisdom: Spot the early warning signs in your own platform before “careless people” smash things up.
Actionable takeaways: Scroll to the end for battle-tested playbooks you can implement—no matter your industry.
If you’re hungry for a fast-paced, eye-opening ride through the highs and lows of Silicon Valley’s biggest stage, Careless People is your ticket. Let’s dive in.
About the Author
Quick-fire Summary
Leadership Profiles: Zuckerberg & Sandberg
Global Hotspots: Russia • China • India • Myanmar
5 Key Lessons + Action Plans
Your Reading Roadmap
Onward!
1. About the Author
Sarah Wynn-Williams is a former senior executive at Meta, where she led global public policy during some of the company’s most turbulent years. With a background in law and international relations, she worked at the frontline of platform governance, misinformation, and tech regulation. Drawing from her insider perspective, she now writes and speaks on the deeper societal impacts of technology—especially what happens when scale, speed, and systems design collide with human values.
2. Book Summary
This book, "Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism" by Sarah Wynn-Williams, is a memoir detailing the author's experiences working in international policy at Facebook. The book offers insights into Facebook's internal culture, its leadership's priorities, and the numerous global challenges and ethical dilemmas the company grappled with during Wynn-Williams' tenure.
The Author's Initial Idealism and Early Experiences:
Wynn-Williams states that she was initially drawn to Facebook by idealism in 2009, a time when optimism about the platform was still possible. She joined Facebook to work on international policy. Her early experiences included trying to convince Mark Zuckerberg of the importance of building relationships with world leaders, an effort exemplified by her wrangling him an invitation to a state dinner at the 2015 Summit of the Americas in Panama, where they found themselves as the only non-heads-of-state present. This event highlights Zuckerberg's initial discomfort and unfamiliarity with political circles. The author notes that her role at Facebook involved navigating a complex environment where significant power and money were in play, often feeling like observing "fourteen-year-olds who’ve been given superpowers". She also had to prepare briefings for senior executives, like Sheryl Sandberg, on interactions with foreign governments, such as the Prime Minister of New Zealand.
Key Themes and Observations:
Facebook's Growth-Driven Culture: The excerpts reveal a strong emphasis on growth and expanding the platform's reach. The pursuit of connecting the "billions who still aren’t on the platform" was a constant focus3.
Leadership and Management:
Mark Zuckerberg is portrayed as initially awkward in political settings but later becoming deeply interested in the political implications of Facebook's decisions. His communication style is described as preferring concise information. He had a "Little Red Book" given to employees outlining the company's philosophy, emphasizing a social mission of making the world more open and connected, even while operating as a corporation. Zuckerberg could be "brutal" in internal discussions. He also displayed a strong belief in Facebook as a "neutral platform". Later, his perspective seemed to shift towards leveraging Facebook's power with politicians.
Sheryl Sandberg is depicted as a charismatic and influential leader. Her book "Lean In" became a significant internal phenomenon, with employees expected to support its promotion. Sandberg focused on making Facebook essential for electoral success globally, and she could be very demanding. She showed a strong interest in data collection and Facebook's potential to play a larger role in various sectors, as seen in her reaction to the organ donation initiative.
There was a clear hierarchy at Facebook where engineers often held significant sway. The policy team was often seen as secondary to the engineering priorities.
Ethical Dilemmas and Global Challenges:
China: The book reveals Facebook's intense and persistent desire to enter the Chinese market, even if it meant making significant compromises regarding censorship and data control. The company developed a "value proposition" for the Chinese government, focusing on surveillance and maintaining social order. There were internal concerns about the ethical implications, including the potential for Facebook employees to be responsible for data requests leading to human rights abuses. The company explored clandestine methods to enter China, using shell companies and apps with misleading information.
Myanmar: The author's experience in Myanmar highlights Facebook's challenges in dealing with hate speech and misinformation that contributed to violence against the Rohingya Muslim population. Despite the severity of the situation, there seemed to be resistance within Facebook to take more decisive action, sometimes prioritizing the development of censorship tools for China over addressing the crisis in Myanmar.
India: The Free Basics initiative in India demonstrated Facebook's aggressive tactics to expand its services, including leveraging its platform to pressure regulators. The company faced criticism for potentially undermining net neutrality.
Russia: The company had to navigate requests from the Russian government to remove content, leading to internal debates about balancing free expression with compliance.
The "Little Red Book" and Company Philosophy: This booklet, inspired by Chairman Mao's, contained quotes and core principles from Mark Zuckerberg, emphasizing Facebook's social mission and encouraging employees to see their work as more than just a job at a corporation. However, the author notes a disconnect between this idealistic messaging and the reality of managing a large, profit-driven company.
The Author's Personal Journey and Growing Disillusionment: The narrative suggests the author's initial idealism gradually eroded as she witnessed the company's decisions and priorities firsthand. Her personal experiences, including a severe health crisis during childbirth while still being expected to work, and the demanding culture around "Lean In", likely contributed to this disillusionment.
Specific Events and Initiatives:
The Summit of the Americas in 2015, where the author tried to facilitate Zuckerberg's engagement with world leaders, only to find them largely ignored.
The organ donation initiative, spearheaded by Sheryl Sandberg, revealed differing views within the company about Facebook's role in addressing societal issues and the extent to which it should collect and manage sensitive data.
The relentless push to enter China, involving the creation of censorship tools, the potential for data storage within China, and the use of shell companies to launch apps.
The Free Basics controversy in India, where Facebook's attempt to provide free internet access was met with resistance over net neutrality concerns and accusations of exploiting its platform's reach.
The crisis in Myanmar, where Facebook was implicated in the spread of hate speech and violence, highlighting the challenges of content moderation in regions with limited local language support and political instability.
Sheryl Sandberg's "Lean In", which became a dominant theme within Facebook, influencing workplace expectations and sometimes creating pressure on female employees. The author's personal experience of being pregnant and still expected to participate in demanding work activities, like the Davos summit, illustrates the complex reality behind the "Lean In" philosophy.
The author's severe medical emergency during childbirth while working on talking points for Sheryl, and the subsequent pressure to return to work quickly, underscore the demanding culture at Facebook.
Conclusion:
The narrative from "Careless People" paints a picture of a powerful company driven by ambitious growth targets, led by individuals with evolving perspectives on their global influence. The book highlights the significant ethical and policy challenges Facebook faced as it expanded globally, particularly in navigating authoritarian regimes and addressing the unintended consequences of its platform. The author's personal narrative of initial idealism giving way to disillusionment underscores the tension between Facebook's stated mission and the realities of its operations and impact on the world. The title itself, referencing "careless people" from The Great Gatsby, suggests a central critique of the leadership's approach to the immense power and responsibility that came with running a platform of Facebook's scale.
3. Russia
The book highlights several issues related to Facebook's interactions with Russia:
Blocking of Alexei Navalny's Rally Page: In December 2014, Facebook blocked an event page in Russia for a rally supporting opposition leader Alexei Navalny. This action followed a complaint from Russia's internet regulator, Roskomnadzor.
Criticism and Mark's Sensitivity: The decision to block the page drew criticism, particularly from the tech community, to which Mark Zuckerberg was particularly sensitive.
Internal Discussions on Handling Government Requests: Sheryl Sandberg defended the takedown as the "right course of action to take to balance free expression with staying up in Russia" and noted its smaller scale compared to potential requests from China. However, Mark felt this "sensitive case" should have been escalated to him, and his initial inclination would have been to "push back on the request rather than immediately taking it down". Ultimately, because the request was "fully compliant with Russian law," the page remained blocked.
US Government's Stance: The US State Department contacted Facebook to relay its "concern" over the removal of the event page. The State Department official told Joel that the US government's position was that Facebook should be shut down in a country rather than remove such content when faced with that choice. Joel's call with the State Department regarding this was "surprisingly brief and unfriendly".
Mark's Perspective on Russia's Importance: Despite these challenges, Mark considered connecting countries where Facebook was blocked, like China and presumably Russia, as a key remaining goal in Facebook's mission to connect the world. He even stated that if Facebook achieved 20% of the internet population in China, it would equate to more users than in Russia, suggesting Russia was not considered a high-performing market.
Mark's Meeting with Russian Leadership: Mark had previously traveled to Russia in 2012 to meet with Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev.
Prioritizing Staying Operational: Sheryl's email indicates a willingness to comply with local laws to maintain Facebook's presence in Russia, even if it meant limiting free expression. This approach suggests that staying operational in the market was prioritized over strict adherence to Facebook's ideals of free expression in this instance.
4. China
Facebook's efforts to enter China involved several key issues and strategic approaches. Mark Zuckerberg considered entering China a crucial step in Facebook's mission to connect the world due to its large internet population. He initiated a three-year plan to achieve this, but ultimately failed due to a combination of factors related to regulatory requirements, operational challenges, and strategic decisions.
Differing Approaches to Online Environments: The core issue highlighted in the book is that Facebook's goal of fostering a more open and connected world differed significantly from the objectives of the Chinese government, which prioritized control over information. This fundamental difference in vision presented a substantial hurdle for Facebook's entry.
Navigating Local Laws and Regulations: To operate in China, Facebook would have needed to comply with local laws regarding content and data. The book indicates that this involved the potential for content censorship and government requests for user data. The company explored establishing partnerships, like the one code-named "Aldrin" with "Jupiter" (Hony Capital), to navigate these regulations. These partnerships aimed to manage content restrictions in accordance with Chinese laws.
Operational Challenges in Content Moderation: The practicalities of content moderation in China presented significant challenges. Facebook considered developing tools, such as an "Extreme Emergency Content Switch," to remove viral content during sensitive times. There were also internal discussions about who would be responsible for responding to government requests for user data, with concerns raised about the potential consequences for Facebook employees.
Risk Assessment and Internal Concerns: Facebook's leadership acknowledged potential risks associated with entering China. These included the possibility of increased criticism regarding censorship and user data practices, as well as potential scrutiny from the US Congress. The team also identified "Aldrin Security Risks," such as the possibility of data being shared inappropriately and broader espionage.
Strategic Efforts and Setbacks: Facebook pursued various strategies to gain entry, including exploring partnerships and even launching stripped-down versions of apps like Moments (Colorful Balloons) and Flash through a shell company, Leaplock. However, these efforts faced setbacks, such as the exposure of the secret app launches by the New York Times.
In essence, while Facebook aimed to access the large Chinese market, the complexities of aligning its operations and principles with the regulatory environment and the information control objectives in China proved to be significant barriers. The company's exploration of various strategies and partnerships ultimately did not result in a full and sustained entry into the country.
5. India
Free Basics, initially launched under the name Internet.org, was a project initiated by Facebook with the stated goal of providing free internet access to people who did not have it. According to Mark Zuckerberg's vision, this initiative aimed to connect the "next 5 billion" people by offering a basic, text-based internet service. This meant that it would exclude high-bandwidth content like movies, high-resolution photos, and music. The Free Basics initiative in India faced several significant issues:
Violation of Net Neutrality: The core objection was that Free Basics did not provide access to the full internet but rather a limited selection of apps and websites approved by Facebook and local service providers. This was seen as a violation of basic principles of net neutrality, which advocates for equal access to all information and services online without requiring permission. Digital rights groups argued that this created a "crap version of the internet" and entrenched the digital divide. They viewed it as a "bait and switch" where Facebook pretended to be about connectivity but was actually a power play to increase Facebook users.
Government Opposition and Ban: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) announced it would investigate programs like Internet.org (the former name of Free Basics) and sought public feedback on whether they should be banned. Despite Facebook's efforts to engage with the government, including Prime Minister Modi's office, TRAI ultimately banned Free Basics completely, with a blanket prohibition of zero rating. This was a major setback for Facebook's ambitions in India, a country with a large offline population.
Negative Public Perception and Criticism: There was significant criticism from a "small, vocal group" who lobbied to shut down Free Basics based on net neutrality. Even some of Facebook's Indian partners, like Flipkart and NDTV, withdrew from the app, likely anticipating the negative outcome. The Ministry of Justice in Brazil also declared the name "Internet.org" misleading and barred its use there.
Facebook's Aggressive and Controversial Tactics: Mark Zuckerberg instructed the team to "go on the offensive" against governments. This led to the development of an "India Action Plan" aimed at "galvanize actual (or at least the appearance of) public support". This included large-scale advertising campaigns across various media, spending tens of millions of dollars, including "dark-post" advertising on Facebook. There were also reports of organizing protests (or "riots," according to some in the marketing team) in support of Free Basics, allegedly by promising free T-shirts. Facebook also activated a "megaphone" pop-up for all Indian Facebook users, urging them to email the regulator in support of Free Basics. TRAI viewed these viral submissions as exploiting Facebook's position as a gatekeeper and felt the submissions didn't genuinely address their questions.
Misleading Messaging and Intentions: Critics felt that the name "Internet.org" was deceptive, suggesting a non-profit enterprise when it was not. They argued that Facebook was primarily focused on increasing its user base rather than genuinely providing internet access. The "free" aspect was also questioned, as in Brazil, the app wasn't entirely free due to minimum balance requirements and tax payments.
Internal Disagreements and Ethical Concerns: The author expressed concerns about Mark's "street fighter tactics" and the compilation of an "enemies list" of anyone opposing Free Basics. She felt that the initiative lacked idealism and was not the revolution she had signed up for. She also refused to establish a "war room" for Brazil's Free Basics launch due to her ethical reservations.
The failure of Free Basics in India was a significant blow to Facebook's global connectivity ambitions and highlighted the complexities and controversies surrounding such initiatives, particularly concerning net neutrality and the potential for dominant platforms to shape internet access.
6. Myanmar
Facebook's involvement and approach in Myanmar were plagued with numerous significant issues, ultimately contributing to a dire situation in the country.
Lethal Carelessness and Inaction: Facebook's leadership, including Joel, Elliot, Sheryl, and Mark, displayed a profound lack of concern and failed to take necessary actions despite clear indications of the platform's negative impact. The author concludes that they "didn't give a fuck" about the situation in Myanmar. These were "sins of omission" – things they didn't do.
Role in Spreading Hate Speech and Misinformation: Facebook played a critical role in the spread of hate speech targeting the Rohingya Muslim minority. The UN report on human rights violations in Myanmar dedicated over twenty pages to this issue. Virulent hate speech circulated, leading to mobs burning down mosques. A fabricated Facebook post in 2014 triggered a riot, leading the junta to temporarily block Facebook. The military later established a massive operation to spread misinformation and hate on Facebook.
Inadequate Content Moderation: Facebook's content moderation for Myanmar was woefully inadequate.
In 2014, when riots were ongoing due to a Facebook post, the content operations team in Dublin struggled to address it because they lacked Burmese speakers and Google Translate was ineffective for Burmese. A Burmese contractor based in Dublin was the primary point of contact, and delays in his response were significant even during emergencies.
There was only one Burmese speaker in Facebook's operations team, compared to hundreds for China. This made it impossible to effectively monitor and address hate speech.
Moderators were reportedly allowing racist content, such as the ethnic slur "kalar," while removing other content inappropriately.
The content operations team often cited a lack of violation of local laws as a reason not to remove harmful content, even when it incited violence.
Language and Technical Barriers: Facebook's platform had significant technical limitations in Myanmar.
The Community Standards were not available in Burmese.
Basic site architecture, including the reporting button, was not in Burmese or displayed corrupted characters.
Facebook was incompatible with the Burmese language as Myanmar did not run on Unicode, making content unreadable for those outside the country and hindering moderation. Despite being aware of this issue, Facebook did not prioritize fixing it.
Lack of Prioritization and Resources: Myanmar was not considered a priority country. Requests for resources, such as hiring a human rights expert to manage Myanmar or implementing Unicode, were consistently denied due to other priorities, such as building censorship tools for China. The size of the Myanmar staff was woefully inadequate compared to other countries.
Flawed Understanding of the Local Context: There was a lack of understanding of Myanmar's fragile political situation and the role Facebook was playing. Millions in Myanmar treated Facebook as the internet, making its impact even more significant.
Problems with the Facebook App: The official Facebook app was unavailable for download in Myanmar, leading users to rely on unofficial versions that lacked reporting functions. This made it nearly impossible for users to report hate speech and other harmful content.
Enabling Destabilization: Facebook's platform was seemingly used to destabilize the country, particularly in the lead-up to the 2015 election. Accounts of liberal candidates were mass-reported and suspended, while hate speech and calls for violence persisted.
Ignoring Warnings and Concerns: Facebook leadership largely ignored warnings and concerns raised internally about the situation in Myanmar. The head of content policy even reassured the content operations team that they had done the right thing despite the escalating violence.
The culmination of these issues led to a situation where Facebook was heavily implicated in the atrocities committed against the Rohingya population, with a UN investigation concluding that Facebook played a "critical role" in spreading hate. The author concludes that Myanmar would have been "far better off if Facebook had never arrived there".
7. Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg is depicted as a complex and evolving figure who transitions from a seemingly idealistic founder to a powerful but often detached and ethically challenged leader. Here's a summary of his portrayal:
Early Skepticism and Disinterest in Politics: Initially, Zuckerberg is portrayed as deeply skeptical and uninterested in the political and policy implications of Facebook's global reach. He plainly does not enjoy engaging with heads of state and international issues, even when it's deemed necessary for the company. He is described as a "political naif".
Focus on Growth and Engineering: Zuckerberg's primary focus appears to be on the growth of Facebook and the interests of its engineers. The "growth team" is seen as the capitalist engine of the company, and engineers are prioritized within the company culture.
Evolving Understanding of Facebook's Impact: There's a turning point where Zuckerberg seemingly comes to the realization that Facebook likely played a role in Donald Trump's election. This suggests a growing, albeit perhaps belated, awareness of the platform's significant real-world influence.
Careless Approach to Global Consequences: The book implies a carelessness regarding the ethical complexities of Facebook's expansion, particularly in authoritarian regimes like China. The pursuit of market access appears to outweigh concerns about human rights and censorship.
Disconnect from Employees and Moral Concerns: The author notes a growing disconnect between Zuckerberg and the concerns of some employees regarding issues like hate speech and the misuse of the platform. He seems "clueless" about how employees are feeling regarding the company's moral authority.
Autocratic Leadership Style: Facebook under Zuckerberg's leadership is described as an "autocracy of one", where important decisions, even those related to content moderation and policy, ultimately rest with him. His decisions can override established guidelines and the advice of policy experts.
Growing Sense of Power and Entitlement: As Facebook's influence expands, Zuckerberg appears to develop a strong sense of his own power and importance. He expects world leaders to accommodate his schedule and his meeting with him becomes a "standard thing" for heads of state. His behavior at events like APEC suggests a belief in his own global stature.
Preoccupation with Legacy and Personal Ambitions: In later parts of the memoir, Zuckerberg becomes increasingly focused on his legacy and activities outside of the core Facebook business, such as his foundation and even the possibility of a political career. His "personal challenges" and actions like attempting to secure land in Hawaii are presented in this light.
Reaction to Criticism and "Fake News": Zuckerberg initially dismisses the idea that fake news on Facebook influenced the 2016 election. When confronted with the evidence, he grapples with accepting Facebook's role and his response is often seen as inadequate or self-serving.
Insensitivity to Employee Welfare: His reaction to the arrest of a Facebook employee in Brazil highlights a potential insensitivity, as his primary focus seems to be on crafting a positive Facebook post rather than prioritizing the employee's release.
Overall, the book paints a picture of a leader who, despite initial signs of wanting to connect the world for good, becomes increasingly driven by growth and his own vision, sometimes at the expense of ethical considerations and the well-being of his employees and the global community affected by his platform. He appears to mature in his understanding of Facebook's power but not necessarily in his responsible exercise of it.
8. Sheryl Sandberg
Sheryl Sandberg is portrayed as a highly influential and complex figure within Facebook, serving as the Chief Operating Officer and the company's "number two". She is depicted as a powerful, ambitious, and often contradictory leader whose actions and beliefs sometimes clash with her public image and the experiences of her employees.
Here's a summary of Sheryl Sandberg as depicted in the book:
Powerful and Influential: Sandberg wields significant power within Facebook, with many important decisions ultimately hinging on her thoughts. She is described as someone who attracts people and whose presence is exciting. Even Mark Zuckerberg reports to her.
Charismatic and Persuasive: When interacting with important figures, such as the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Sandberg can turn on immense charisma, transforming into someone "genuinely glamorous" and making others forget the substance of the meeting while being awestruck by her.
Contradictions Between Public Persona and Private Behavior: Despite her public advocacy for women in the workplace through "Lean In," her internal behavior and the environment she fosters at Facebook are often at odds with these principles. Female employees were expected to do "office housework" to support her book launch. The book suggests a disconnect between the "Lean In" message of female empowerment and the realities faced by women working for her.
Demanding and Temperamental: Sandberg is shown to have a quick temper and can be berating and humiliating towards her staff, including close colleagues. These outbursts appear arbitrary and unpredictable. She has a conference room nicknamed "Only Good News," ironically highlighting her anger-management issues.
Focused on Growth and Political Influence: Similar to Mark Zuckerberg, Sandberg is interested in Facebook's growth and its role as a global business force. She actively engages with political leaders and seeks to understand and influence policy. She is also depicted as being interested in leveraging Facebook's influence in campaigns and elections.
Close Relationships and Favoritism: Sandberg appears to have a close inner circle, including individuals like Marne Levine and later, her young assistant Sadie. She rewards those close to her with various benefits and opportunities. Her relationships with her inner circle can also be demanding, with expectations of obedience and closeness.
Insensitivity and Detachment: At times, Sandberg seems detached from the everyday realities and concerns of her employees. For instance, she breezily instructs a pregnant employee on childcare. Her reaction to the Women's March is one of disinterest, focusing instead on Melania Trump's attire.
Strategic and Results-Oriented: Despite her temper, Sandberg is highly strategic and focused on achieving her goals, whether it's securing a photo opportunity with a prime minister or navigating complex political landscapes.
Relationship with Mark Zuckerberg: She works closely with Mark Zuckerberg, advising him on government relations. While he is ultimately the final decision-maker, Sandberg plays a crucial role in shaping Facebook's policies and strategies. There are instances where their approaches differ, such as on the organ donation project, where engineers (presumably with Zuckerberg's backing) held more sway than Sandberg's team.
Ethical Ambiguity: The book suggests instances where Sandberg's actions and priorities raise ethical questions, such as Facebook "sucking up to authoritarian regimes like China" and the company's approach to data collection and user targeting. Her involvement in the hiring of a Republican opposition research firm to smear critics also emerged later.
Overall, "Careless People" portrays Sheryl Sandberg as a powerful and influential leader who is brilliant and effective but also exhibits demanding, inconsistent, and sometimes ethically questionable behavior behind her carefully crafted public image of a champion for women in the workplace. Her focus on growth and political influence for Facebook often appears to overshadow ethical considerations and the well-being of her employees.
9. Key Quotes
"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made." (This is a quote from The Great Gatsby used as an epigraph.)
“He wants to sit next to Castro,” Javi says. “Not happening,” I respond. (This illustrates the author's role in managing Zuckerberg's interactions at the Summit of the Americas.)
"Mark waits on the edge of the crowd, not convinced about any of this. It’s my job at Facebook to run international policy, and to make this matter I need ..." (This highlights the author's responsibility to make Zuckerberg's presence at international events meaningful.)
"Usually, he’s hounded by people who think he’s the most interesting person in the room. Now he stands awkwardly in the middle of this fancy party, a fish out of water." (This describes Zuckerberg's unusual experience of being ignored at a state dinner.)
I SA VED MYSELF (This quote reflects a moment of personal realization and a shift in the author's perspective.)
“Do you know what the single most impactful thing to actually protect the oceans over the last decade is?” “No. Nemo.” “The fish,” he added. “That little fishy they have to find.” “Ah.” I finally got it. “Finding Nemo.” (This anecdote illustrates the author's disillusionment with the slow and often ineffective nature of international bureaucracy compared to the impact of popular culture.)
"I was in awe of its ineffable potential." (This expresses the author's initial optimistic view of Facebook's potential impact.)
"The vastness of the information Facebook would be collecting was unprecedented. Data about everything. Data that was previously entirely private. Data on the citizens of every country. A historic amount of data and so incredibly valuable. Information is power." (This quote foreshadows the significant implications of Facebook's data collection.)
"At some point, governments would want to control it." (This highlights a key challenge Facebook would face as its influence grew.)
"This is the Obama era, a time when Mark and Sheryl are on the covers of magazines, giving interviews with flashy headlines about how they’re changing the world. The boys corner Marne, demanding to know how we’re meant to change the world. They’re shocked when the answer is … nothing really." (This reveals a disconnect between public perception and Facebook's internal view of its mission.)
"Our philosophy on perks is that we want to provide services that are utilitarian and help people with things they need in order to help them focus on our long-term goals." (This explains Facebook's approach to employee perks, as stated in the "Little Red Book.")
“Facebook was built to accomplish a social mission—to make the world more open and connected.” (This is presented as a core principle from Facebook's "Little Red Book.")
“We make the decisions,” I’m told. The bosses don’t want a bunch of outsiders all up in our business that way. (This illustrates the centralized decision-making at Facebook.)
Marne explains that Facebook’s built on the kinds of free speech rights embodied by the First Amendment in the United States, so we generally leave content untouched. (This outlines Facebook's initial stance on content moderation, rooted in First Amendment principles.)
"I’m sympathetic to what the boys are saying. From the moment we met, Marne treated my “Facebook is a revolution,” “Facebook is a political force” speeches as vaguely embarrassing. She politely ignored that part of my pitch and since then has consistently communicated that this isn’t what we are." (This reveals the author's early belief in Facebook's political significance, which was not shared by her superiors.)
"The greatest threat to Facebook is us, it’s all of us." (This is a quote from Sheryl Sandberg about the potential for internal complacency at Facebook.)
"Japan has always been a difficult country for Facebook. Our growth rates there have never matched those in the rest of the world. The most compelling theory is that Japan has a culture that doesn’t like sharing personal information online." (This highlights a challenge Facebook faced in a specific market due to cultural factors.)
"Terrorism means the conversation on privacy is ‘basically dead’ as policymakers are more concerned about intelligence/security.” In other words, this is a moment when governments are more interested in surveillance than people’s privacy. Which is good for Facebook’s business. (This reveals a cynical perspective on how global events could benefit Facebook's interests.)
"Anyone who opposes us is an adversary," Mark responds firmly. Not acknowledging that when it comes to Free Basics, that’s basically everyone. (This illustrates a combative and uncompromising stance adopted by Zuckerberg regarding opposition to Facebook's initiatives.)
"Facebook employees will be responsible for user data responses that could lead to death, torture and incarceration.” (This quote, found in internal documents, highlights the grave ethical concerns surrounding Facebook's potential entry into China.)
“The idea that Facebook cares about people’s privacy is not believable anywhere.” (This is a key finding from Facebook's own consumer research regarding public perception.)
“that our service in China operates under the same constraints as other Chinese social media platforms.” (This outlines a key argument Facebook planned to use to defend its actions in China.)
“Do you have any ‘red lines’ you won’t cross in order to get into China?” (This represents a crucial question considered internally regarding Facebook's China strategy.)
“Respectfully, Senator, that is an unfair comparison and I resent the implication that doing business in China is akin to abetting crimes against humanity.” (This reveals a prepared response to a highly sensitive question anticipated during potential congressional scrutiny of Facebook's China plans.)
"Move Fast and Break Things." (This well-known Facebook motto is referenced in the context of the company's approach to growth and expansion, sometimes at the expense of careful consideration of consequences.)
"You don’t get a cookie for not being a scumbag," (This quote reflects a sentiment within the company regarding recognition for basic decent behavior.)
"I always believe that when companies and people have to say things over and over it is because they want them to be true but they are not." (This expresses a cynical view on corporate messaging and self-perception.)
"What are you talking about?” “You know, Rooooosseeeebuuud.” Mark looks baffled. Oh god. This was a very bad idea. “Citizen Kane?” Nothing from Mark. (This concluding exchange highlights a disconnect between the author's cultural references and Zuckerberg's understanding.)
10. Lessons and Action Plans
Here are the top 5 lessons learned, along with a comprehensive motivational story from the book for each, and a corresponding action plan for product builders and business leaders:
Lesson 1: Growth at All Costs Can Lead to Ethical Compromises and Long-Term Damage.
Motivational Story: The push for Internet.org/Free Basics illustrates the dangers of prioritizing growth metrics over ethical considerations. Driven by the goal of connecting billions of new users, Facebook offered a limited, free internet service that critics argued violated net neutrality. The company aggressively promoted Free Basics, even employing tactics to create the "appearance of public support" in India. Despite internal and external concerns about the lack of encryption, privacy policy, and the potential for hindering a truly open internet, the pursuit of growth continued. The ultimate ban in India and the ethical questions raised demonstrate the long-term damage that can result from unchecked growth.
Action Plan:
Integrate Ethical Considerations into Goal Setting: When defining growth targets, explicitly include ethical implications as key performance indicators (KPIs) and decision-making criteria.
Establish Cross-Functional Ethics Review Boards: Create teams comprising policy, engineering, legal, and ethics experts to assess the ethical implications of new products and growth strategies before and during implementation.
Prioritize User Well-being over Raw User Acquisition: Focus on providing genuine value and positive experiences for users, rather than solely maximizing sign-ups, even if it means slower initial growth.
Implement Mechanisms for Internal Whistleblowing and Ethical Dissent: Foster a culture where employees feel safe to raise ethical concerns without fear of reprisal, and establish clear processes for addressing these concerns.
Conduct Regular Ethical Audits: Periodically review existing products and growth strategies to identify and address any unforeseen ethical consequences or potential harms.
Lesson 2: A Company's Culture Shapes Its Products and Its Impact on the World.
Motivational Story: The prevailing culture at Facebook, characterized by the early motto "move fast and break things" and a strong engineering-centric viewpoint, significantly influenced its products and responses to global issues. The initial lack of consideration for international policy implications and the struggles to develop effective content moderation policies illustrate how internal values shaped the company's impact. The difficulty in prioritizing policy concerns over engineering priorities, as seen with the organ donation "megaphone", further highlights the power of company culture. The slow development and inconsistent enforcement of Community Standards demonstrate the challenges of embedding ethical considerations in a rapidly growing and internally driven culture.
Action Plan:
Define and Communicate Core Values that Emphasize Ethics and Responsibility: Clearly articulate the company's commitment to ethical behavior and social responsibility as fundamental values.
Promote Diversity and Inclusion at All Levels: Ensure a wide range of perspectives are represented in decision-making processes to mitigate blind spots and consider diverse user needs and potential impacts.
Invest in Ethics Training and Awareness Programs: Regularly educate employees on ethical principles, potential biases, and the company's ethical guidelines.
Foster a Culture of Open Dialogue and Feedback: Encourage critical thinking and create channels for employees to openly discuss ethical dilemmas and provide feedback on product decisions and company practices.
Recognize and Reward Ethical Conduct: Acknowledge and incentivize employees and teams who demonstrate ethical decision-making and contribute to responsible innovation.
Lesson 3: Navigating Global Political Landscapes Requires Sensitivity, Respect, and a Genuine Understanding of Local Context.
Motivational Story: Facebook's extensive efforts to enter China demonstrate the complexities and ethical dilemmas of navigating international political landscapes. The willingness to consider a local partner to handle censorship and data, and the development of censorship tools to comply with Chinese regulations, raised serious ethical questions about the company's commitment to free expression. The author's description of the China strategy as potentially involving a "web of deceit" highlights the risks of prioritizing market access over ethical principles and transparency. The ultimate struggles and lack of full entry into China despite significant compromises underscore the challenges of navigating fundamentally different political and value systems.
Action Plan:
Invest in Local Expertise and Cultural Understanding: Hire local experts and conduct thorough research to understand the specific political, social, and cultural nuances of each target market.
Engage in Transparent and Respectful Dialogue with Governments and Civil Society: Build genuine relationships with local stakeholders, actively listen to their concerns, and be transparent about the company's intentions and operations.
Develop Context-Specific Policies and Practices: Avoid a one-size-fits-all approach and adapt policies and product features to align with local laws, cultural norms, and human rights standards.
Establish Clear Ethical Red Lines for International Expansion: Define non-negotiable ethical principles that will guide decisions regarding market entry and operations, even if it means forgoing potential growth opportunities.
Prioritize Long-Term Sustainability over Short-Term Gains: Focus on building trust and fostering positive relationships with local communities and governments for sustainable long-term success, rather than pursuing rapid expansion at the expense of ethical considerations.
Lesson 4: Leadership's Actions and Priorities Set the Tone for the Entire Organization.
Motivational Story: The leadership styles and priorities of Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg significantly influenced Facebook's culture and approach to various issues. Zuckerberg's intense focus on growth and his initial apparent detachment from policy and ethical concerns set a tone that sometimes prioritized expansion over responsible governance. Sandberg's emphasis on "Lean In" principles, while aiming to empower women, was perceived by some as placing personal responsibility above systemic issues and at times created internal pressure. The directive to send an email in Sandberg's voice, advocating for a view the author didn't agree with, illustrates how leadership actions can directly impact employee behavior and ethical decision-making. Zuckerberg's overruling of a policy decision without full understanding highlights the impact of centralized decision-making on established processes and expertise.
Action Plan:
Model Ethical Behavior and Accountability from the Top: Leaders must consistently demonstrate a commitment to ethical principles and take responsibility for the company's impact.
Clearly Communicate Ethical Expectations and Priorities: Leaders should explicitly and regularly communicate the importance of ethical conduct and integrate it into the company's strategic objectives.
Empower and Support Ethical Leadership at All Levels: Encourage managers and employees to champion ethical decision-making within their teams and provide them with the resources and support to do so.
Establish Mechanisms for Holding Leaders Accountable for Ethical Lapses: Implement processes for reviewing and addressing unethical behavior by individuals at all levels of the organization, including leadership.
Actively Seek and Value Diverse Perspectives in Leadership: Ensure that leadership teams represent a range of backgrounds and viewpoints to foster more balanced and ethically sound decision-making.
Lesson 5: Recognizing and Addressing the Unintended Consequences of Products is a Fundamental Responsibility.
Motivational Story: The book details several instances where Facebook's platform had significant unintended negative consequences, such as its role in the spread of misinformation during the 2016 US election and its contribution to violence in Myanmar. The initial reluctance by leadership to fully acknowledge or address these issues, and the prioritization of growth over implementing necessary safeguards, demonstrates a failure to adequately consider and respond to the platform's real-world impacts. The difficulty in getting resources allocated to address hate speech in Myanmar while significant resources were dedicated to initiatives like Chinese censorship highlights a misalignment of priorities in addressing unintended harmful consequences.
Action Plan:
Integrate Risk Assessment into the Product Development Lifecycle: Proactively identify and evaluate potential negative consequences and risks associated with new and existing products.
Invest in Robust Monitoring and Analysis Systems: Continuously monitor platform activity and user behavior to detect and understand emerging unintended consequences.
Establish Clear Reporting and Escalation Pathways for Harmful Content and Activities: Create efficient processes for users and internal teams to report potentially harmful content and ensure these reports are promptly and effectively addressed.
Develop and Enforce Comprehensive Content Moderation Policies: Implement clear, consistently enforced policies that address a wide range of harmful content, including misinformation, hate speech, and incitement to violence, adapting these policies based on evolving societal contexts.
Collaborate with External Experts and Organizations: Engage with researchers, civil society groups, and other experts to gain insights into potential harms and develop effective mitigation strategies.
Be Transparent and Accountable for Addressing Negative Impacts: Publicly acknowledge the platform's role in negative events and clearly communicate the steps being taken to address them.
11. Conclusion
In conclusion, the journey through the book "Careless People" reveals a period of intense ambition and significant ethical and operational challenges for Facebook as it navigated the complexities of global expansion. Mark Zuckerberg's unwavering commitment to connecting the world, with China seen as the pivotal "last major project," drove much of the company's strategic focus. However, this ambition was often pursued with a seeming disregard for the "inevitable moral dilemmas" associated with operating in authoritarian regimes, as evidenced by the internal discussions surrounding content censorship and government data requests in China.
The book highlights a recurring tension between Facebook's espoused principles, such as free expression, and the pragmatic need to comply with local laws, even when those laws facilitate censorship and suppression. This is starkly illustrated by the blocking of Instagram in China and the contrasting approaches to content moderation in different countries like Russia and Myanmar. The failure to adequately address hate speech in Myanmar, despite internal warnings, underscores the real-world consequences of these policy decisions.
Initiatives like Internet.org (later Free Basics) aimed to expand internet access but faced significant criticism regarding net neutrality and potential biases. The challenges encountered in India demonstrate the complexities of navigating regulatory landscapes and public opinion in diverse markets.
Throughout these events, the author's personal journey provides a critical lens on the internal culture and decision-making processes at Facebook. Her initial idealism gradually gives way to disillusionment as she witnesses the prioritization of growth and political expediency over ethical considerations and the well-being of individuals, both users and employees. Her experiences, including the demanding work culture during maternity leave and the handling of her complaints, further highlight the internal challenges and contradictions within the company.
Ultimately, the book paints a picture of a company grappling with immense power and influence, struggling to balance its global ambitions with its ethical responsibilities and the diverse realities of the markets it seeks to enter. The author's departure signals a profound personal reckoning with the direction Facebook was heading, leaving the reader to consider the long-term implications of these decisions.
Finally, if this review sparks your curiosity, I highly recommend reading the full book. It’s packed with sharp insights, cultural depth, and stories that will stay with you long after the last page. In addition, I’d also recommend An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination—a book that sparked deep reflection on the same themes.